There are quite simple, intuitive and straightforward expressions for evaluating the area or volume of a figure. But why is the expression for the length of a curve so complicated?
Why is the integral expression for the length of a curve more complicated than the expression for area or volume of a figure rotated?
2
$\begingroup$
calculus
-
0In what sense is it more complicated? Is it because of the appearance of the square root which makes it hard to find an anti-derivative, even though the function may have a nice anti-derivative? – 2010-07-27
-
0Yes; the square root makes things more complicated. Moreover in the other cases, it is a differential form of a certain weight. – 2010-07-27
-
0In all cases you're integrating a differential form. The cases are really not different since in each one you integrate the volume element over a manifold (a 1-manifold in the case of finding the length of the curve). The difference is that in finding the length of the curve, the volume element is induced by the metric. – 2010-07-27